I partially understand some of the differences, the IPSC target seems to be more gamed out with scoring, but the zones make sense, but the IDPA targets seem to make more sense (to me). Any thoughts as to the merits of either? I have used the Viking Tactics targets as well, and they combine the two, but for simplicity, but is it getting too far into it to have a preference? I am not looking to do IPSC, but IDPA hopefully. Part of me seems to believe that it really works out to COM is COM, a head is a head, and there is no scoring for what I am really practicing for. Thoughts, suggestions? The focus would be on practical marksmanship.